Arsenal blog Goodplaya has a good section about the punishments handed out to Michael Ball and Michael Brown by the FA. It’s a subject we’ve covered before on this blog and yet again we see the outlooked of the game’s authorities is totally skewed.
How is it possible to justify three match bans for Kolo Toure and Jon Obi Mikel - and a four match ban for Emmanuel Adebayor - after the Carling Cup final for what was little more than pushing and shoving? No punches thrown. No violent conduct. No injuries or potential for injury to be suffered by any player.
Then you have Brown and Ball. Ball deliberately stamped on Cristiano Ronaldo and did it only with the purpose of hurting him and perhaps putting him out of the game. Brown headbutted Liverpool’s Xabi Alonso - the intent wasn’t as bad as Ball’s but it was still an act soley to cause pain to an opponent.
Yet they get the same three matches as the others. It’s absolute nonsense.
If the FA, and I get tired saying this, want to cut out violent conduct then they need to punish players far more when they behave like thugs. Fair enough, we’ll accept three match bans for ‘ungentlemanly conduct’ and general poor behaviour but we cannot possibly accept bans like that when people who set out to hurt other players are treated the same way.
It’s like sentencing a shoplifter and rapist to the same amount of prison time. Only in the twisted world of the FA does the disciplinary procedure make any kind of sense.