The Future’s Not Bright If It’s Orange
Yesterday’s announcement by David Dein that he has sold his shares in Arsenal for £75m is NOT good news for Arsenal, or the game in my (humble) opinion. I’m not going to go into specifics, but several aspects and a couple of quotes rang alarm bells for me.
First - another Russian with buckets of cash and a dodgy background. Bit too familiar, that.
Second - Dein says the club needs people…
…prepared to invest previously unimaginable sums aimed at winning the game’s biggest prizes.
Buying trophies and success in other words. Bit familiar again.
Farhad Moshiri says:
Arsenal is a great club with huge potential and we look forward to increasing our stake and exploring ways to help support the future development of the club for the benefit of all fans and shareholders
Bollocks. Utter bollocks. Not the bit about Arsenal being a great club, but use of the word “benefit”.
Arsenal is seen as a very traditional club, and not one to throw money around too much, a la Newcastle, Chelsea etc. Criticisms levelled in recent years have often revolved around the lack of English (or British) players in the first team - spending “previously unimaginable sums” does not suggest developing young talent - it suggests superstars, Galacticos if you will; and we know that does not breed success as Real Madrid showed during their most profligate times.
The only part of this announcement that is positive for Arsenal in my opinion is with regard to Arsene Wenger. It’s widely believed that if he goes, then the likes of Fabregas will go with him. They’re right that Wenger is vital to the immediate future of this team (not the club, that will carry on long after he’s gone), his work with the new ground, training facilities and youth set up have been integral to the long term future of the club but as we all know, success is needed know and he is the best man to bring it in.
The last thing the game in this country needs is more money.

What this reminds me of is the battle that record companies have had over the years with file sharing. When sites like Napster and Audiogalaxy made it simple for people to share their music the first thought of the record companies was not ‘How can we use this technology to expand and improve our operations?’ but ‘How can we stop it?’.